Evaluation of RFE Satellite Precipitation and its Use in Streamflow Simulation in Poorly Gauged Basins

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Darko, S.
dc.contributor.author Adjei, K. A.
dc.contributor.author Gyamfi, C.
dc.contributor.author Odai, S. N.
dc.contributor.author Osei-Wusuansa, H.
dc.date.accessioned 2022-08-22T13:28:30Z
dc.date.available 2022-08-22T13:28:30Z
dc.date.issued 2021
dc.identifier.issn 21987491
dc.identifier.other 10.1007/s40710-021-00495-2
dc.identifier.uri https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40710-021-00495-2
dc.identifier.uri http://atuspace.atu.edu.gh:8080/handle/123456789/114
dc.description.abstract Abstract: The performance of satellite Rainfall Estimates (RFE, version 2.0) at daily resolution was evaluated in comparison with ground-based meteorological datasets (GBD) by applying statistical and hydrological modeling approaches. In-situ daily rainfall observations from 5 stations in and around the periphery of the Nasia river basin in Ghana, covering a period of 15 years (2001–2015), were used in this research. Comparison of the observed rainfall data with satellite-based estimates revealed a strong positive correlation, which yielded the highest correlation coefficient (R2) of 0.74 at the monthly timescale as against the weak positive linear relationship with the highest R2 of 0.41 at the daily timescale. Mean annual precipitation computed from both datasets also showed close correspondence yielding 978.83 mm/annum and 977.12 mm/annum for RFE and GBD, respectively. Calibration at the daily timescale showed that the ground-based data (GBD) performed better in simulating the observed streamflows compared to the satellite-based (RFE) simulations yielding a Nash Sutcliffe Efficiency (NSE) of 0.81 and 0.67 for the GBD and RFE, respectively. At the monthly timescale, the performance of both datasets improved, resulting in an NSE of 0.89 and 0.80 for the GBD and RFE, respectively. Although the RFE-based simulations could not perfectly reproduce the observed discharge, it can be used to supplement traditional in-situ gauge data to address the problem of non-availability of observed rainfall data for hydrological applications such as water resources planning and assessment. Future research into the usability of the RFE in other medium scale river basins could be carried out to compare with these results. Highlights: • There is a strong correlation between RFE version 2.0 and ground-based monthly rainfall data • RFE-based simulations appear to underestimate the observed hydrographs compared to ground-based data simulations • RFE could be used to supplement in-situ observations of rainfall for hydrological analysis en_US
dc.description.sponsorship World Bank Group; Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries vol;8
dc.subject Calibration-validation en_US
dc.subject Ground-based data en_US
dc.subject HEC-HMS modeling en_US
dc.subject Nasia river basin en_US
dc.subject RFE; Streamflow en_US
dc.subject White Volta river basin en_US
dc.title Evaluation of RFE Satellite Precipitation and its Use in Streamflow Simulation in Poorly Gauged Basins en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account