ATU Infohub Repository

Antibiotic prophylaxis and cloacal carriage of resistant zoonotic bacteria in commercially-bred poultry

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Arhin, R. E.
dc.contributor.author Hackman, H. K.
dc.contributor.author Sa-eed, A.
dc.date.accessioned 2022-09-01T11:06:04Z
dc.date.available 2022-09-01T11:06:04Z
dc.date.issued 2019
dc.identifier.issn 2520-4945
dc.identifier.uri file:///C:/Users/Library%20Staff/Downloads/424-Article%20Text-1922-1-10-20191105.pdf
dc.identifier.uri http://atuspace.atu.edu.gh:8080/handle/123456789/184
dc.description.abstract Purpose: The aim of this study was to determine the relationship between the use of antibiotic prophylactics in commercial poultry breeding and cloacal carriage of antibiotic-resistant zoonotic bacteria. Methodology: Biodata was collected on poultry from 11 selected farms. Cloacal swabs were collected from 10 birds from each farm for culture, isolation and biochemical identification of bacteria isolates. Antibiotic susceptibility of 96 Enterobacteriaceae and 24 Staphylococcus aureus isolates were determined by disk diffusion. Findings: Antibiotics prophylaxis administered to the birds were chloramphenicol (40/110), penicillin (20/110), doxycycline (20/110), gentamicin (10/110), neomycin (10/100) and a combination of chloramphenicol, ampicillin, penicillin and cloxacillin (10/100). These were administered either weekly (90/110), every 3 days (10/110) or monthly (10/100). Two hundred and fifty six (256) different bacteria isolates were recovered. These were Escherichia coli (31.6%), Staphylococcus aureus (14.5%), Staphylococcus epidermidis (12.1%), Proteus sp. (12.1%), Citrobacter sp. (9%), Proteus vulgaris (5.1%), Salmonella enterica (4.7%), Citrobacter koseri (4.3%), Klebsiella sp. (2.8%), Klebsiella pneumoniae (2.3%), Shigella sp. (2.3%), Enterobacter sp. (0.8%) and Klebsiella oxytoca (0.4%). Of 96 Enterobacteriaceae, 60 (63%) were multidrug resistant. Enterobacteriaceae were resistant to ampicillin (54%), tetracycline (52%), cotrimoxazole (54%), gentamicin (22%), cefuroxime (44%), vancomycin (19%), chloramphenicol (39%), ceftriaxone (29%), cefotaxime (71%), ciprofloxacicn (21%), amikacin (10%) and meropenem (23%). Of 24 Staphylococcus aureus, 17 (71%) were multidrug resistant. Staphylococcus aureus were resistant to ampicillin (89%), cotrimoxazole (59%), gentamicin (24%), vancomycin (67%), ciprofloxacin (18%), meropenem (33%), tetracycline (85%), cloxacillin (100%), penicillin (81%), erythromycin (71%), cefuroxime (43%) and augmentin (45%). Doxycycline-prophylaxis wasignificantly related (0.001) to tetracycline-nonsusceptible isolates but chloramphenicol-prophylaxis and penicillin-prophylaxis were not significantly related (<0.05) to resistance to their corresponding antibiotics. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher AJP en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries vol;1
dc.subject Antibiotics en_US
dc.subject prophylactics en_US
dc.subject zoonotic en_US
dc.subject poultry en_US
dc.subject resistant en_US
dc.title Antibiotic prophylaxis and cloacal carriage of resistant zoonotic bacteria in commercially-bred poultry en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search ATU Infohub


Browse

My Account